God: "I looked for someone to take a stand for me, and stand in the gap" (Ezekiel 22:30)
He spared not his own Son, but delivered him up for us all; how shall He not with him freely give us all things' (Romans 8:32)? How is it imaginable that God should withhold, after this, spirituals or temporals, from His people? How shall He not call them effectually, justify them freely, sanctify them thoroughly, and glorify them eternally? How shall He not clothe them, feed them, protect and deliver them? Surely if He would not spare this own Son one stroke, one tear, one groan, one sigh, one circumstance of misery, it can never be imagined that ever He should, after this, deny or withhold from His people, for whose sakes all this was suffered, any mercies, any comforts, any privilege, spiritual or temporal, which is good for them.
(Acts 3 : 12)
THE spirit of Christianity, or the law of Christ,
differs strikingly from that of the Mosaic law.
The old covenant was the ministration of death, written
and engraven upon tables of stone; while the new cov-
enant is the ministration of life, written in the fleshly
tables of the heart (2 Cor. 3:3-9). The law of Moses
is known as the "law of sin and death"; but the gos-
pel is known as the "law of the Spirit of life in Christ
Jesus" (Eom. 8:2), or "the perfect law of liberty"
(Jas. 1: 25). The essential difference between Judaism
and Christianity is made manifest in contrasting the
spirit of the Decalogue with that of the Beatitudes.
The Ten Commandments have been called the "Thou
shalt notV of God. The entire Mosaic law was nega-
tive—a system of curses and blessings, all of which
were temporal, as punishments for disobedience and
rewards for obedience. The Beatitudes, on the other
hand, as well as the entire gospel system, are positive:
a system of positive enactments, positive institutions
and positive promises. The old covenant, which was
full of denunciations- — the spirit of the Decalogue —
contrasts richly with the new covenant, which is prodi-
gal of blessings — the spirit of the Sermon on the
Mount. "The thunders of Sinai, proclaiming the Deca-
logue, form a striking contrast to the gentle voice of
the Son of man on the Mount of Beatitudes, proclaim-
ing the religion of love." — Dummelow.
Christianity alone, of all systems of religion, is
positive. Jesus Christ alone, of all religious or philo-
sophical teachers, makes humility a positive and essen-
tial factor of righteousness. He alone makes humility
the road to ultimate exaltation — not only by precept,
but also by example.
"What is humility? (Matt. v. 3). It is poverty of
spirit. Poverty of spirit is the opposite of pride, self-
righteousness and self-conceit; the spirit of the publi-
can in contrast with that of the Pharisee (Luke 18 : 10-
14) ; the spirit of the one who prefers to learn and
obey, rather than to teach and command (Matt. 7 : 21 ;
Acts 9:6; Gal. 2 : 20) ; the spirit of those who, as little
children, trust implicitly in the Father's protection,
and obey Him without question (Matt. 18:1-6). Hu-
mility always implies unselfishness, obedience and con-
secration. Humility is the complete crucifixion of
self — the complete subjection of the individual will to
the will of Christ. If self-discovered, humility becomes
a calloused egoism that is displeasing alike to God and
man.
1. Humility is the fundamental principle of the
teaching of Christ. Jesus Christ gave to the world a
perfect system, whether viewed in the light of ethics,
sociology or philosophy. His teachings, when applied
to individual, community or nation, result in moral
and spiritual uplift. An individual, community or
nation is civilized or barbarian in the same proportion
that His teachings are applied to the individual, com-
munity or national existence. No other teacher ever
approached the moral standard set in the teachings of
Christ— a fact which goes to prove that He is indeed
the Son of God.
Humility is the keynote of His teaching. Other
reformers had taught and practiced asceticism, as
Buddha; some had taught that dignity and paternal
reverence were the essentials to true happiness, as Con-
fucius ; and some had found true happiness in military
splendor and power, as Mohammed. The Stoics taught
that the wise man was blessed; the Epicureans taught
that blessedness consisted in the satisfaction of tem-
poral desires. The cynic looked upon happiness as the
dream of the idealist. But Jesus Christ taught that
blessedness consists in standing in the right relation to
God; and that humility, or poverty of spirit, is the
road to true and lasting greatness. Since the establish-
ment of such a principle, those only have really been
great who have been the greatest servants (Matt. 26:
28; Mark 10:28-31).
The first blessing of the Sermon on the Mount was
bestowed upon the ' ' poor in spirit. ' ' All the remain-
ing blessings are incidental to the first. The one who
is poor in spirit will naturally glory in tribulation, be
meek as well as merciful, hunger and thirst after right-
eousness, be pure in heart, a lover of peace, and able to
endure all manner of persecution (Matt. 5 : 1-12 ; Rom.
5:3-5; Heb. 12:11).
From a material point of view, there is neither
virtue in poverty nor vice in riches. Lazarus, though
poor in this world's goods, went to a happy reward in
Abraham's bosom (Luke 16:22). Abraham, though
rich in cattle and land, was a friend of God. God ac-
cepted the widow's mite with blessing, for it was the
best she could do; but He expected the rich to cast in
much "out of their abundance" (Mark 12:41-44).
Eiches merely increase responsibility as stewards of
God. Blessedness depends upon the condition of the
heart. Those who are rich in spirit, proud, selfish,
arrogant, can not be blessed ; but those who are poor in
spirit, humble, unselfish, are blessed, and to them be-
longs the kingdom of heaven. So, when the disciples
asked Jesus who would be greatest in the kingdom, He
selected a little child as the model of His greatest sub-
ject; and showed them that they must become as hum-
ble and obedient, as willing to learn and obey, as that
little child, before they could ever enter the kingdom
(Matt. 18:1-6).
2. Humility was the principal characteristic of the
life of Christ. Jesus of Nazareth is above all other
teachers in that He gave a perfect example of what
He taught. Other great religious and philosophical
teachers have given the world moral systems, but have
failed to live up to their teachings. Religious teachers
of recent date have given the world new systems of re-
ligious thought, but have destroyed the effect of their
systems by impure lives. Jesus was divine in the fact
that He not only gave a perfect teaching, but also gave
a perfect example of what He taught.
Humility was the fundamental characteristic of His
life. He gave up riches and glory to suffer the humilia-
tion of the cross, in order to redeem a lost and rebel-
lious humanity (2 Cor. 8:9). He became even poorer
than bird or beast (Matt. 8 : 20) . He washed His dis-
ciples ' feet in order to teach them a lesson of humility
(John 13: 1-17). The same poverty of spirit led Him
to agonize in Gethsemane until His sweat became as
drops of blood, yet the burden of His prayer was
always, "Thy will be done'' (Matt. 26:36-46; Luke
22: 39-46). The climax of His humiliation came in the
agony and suffering of the cross. Yet, because He
humbled Himself unto death, He was crowned Lord of
all (Phil. 2:5-11). His whole life on earth was an
exposition of His cardinal precept (Luke 14: 11) .
3. Humility ivas the dominant characteristic of the
ministry of the apostles. Previous to Pentecost, the
apostles were selfish, unspiritual and cowardly. After
the coming of the Spirit on Pentecost, they became the
unselfish, obedient, courageous champions of the gospel.
Note the power with which Peter preached on Pente-
cost (Acts 2 : 14-37J^v
The attitude of the apostles at the Beautiful Gate
(Acts 3: 1-12). They gave all the glory to God. How
different from the spirit of the Pope of Rome, who
claims to be the legitimate successor of Peter, "the
personal representative of Christ upon earth"!
The attitude of the apostles in the presence of the
high priest and the Jewish council (Acts 4:19, 20; 5:
29). The courage and faith of Stephen, the first mar-
tyr (Acts 7:51-60).
The attitude of Paul after his conversion is ex-
pressed in the one statement, "Lord, what wilt thou
have me to do?" (Acts 9:6). The exhibition of faith
on the part of Paul and Silas in the prison at Philippi
(Acts 16: 25). The courage manifested by Paul in the
presence of the Greek philosophers on Mars' Hill (Acts
17:16-32) ; in the stinging rebuke administered to the
high priest (Acts 23:1-4); in the defense before
Agrippa (Acts 26). The keynote of Paul's ministry
(Acts 26: 19). He was devoted whole-heartedly to the
cause of Christ (Rom. 1 : 16 ; 1 Cor. 2 : 1-5 ; 9 : 16 ; Phil.
1:21-24).
The apostles had a definite message. To them,
everything was secondary to the one great task of serv-
ing the Master (1 Cor. 4:9-13). For this common
cause they endured persecution and martyrdom (2 Cor.
6 : 4-10 ; 11 : 23-33 ; 12 : 7-10) . Yet they looked forward
to an eternal reward (Acts 7 : 55, 56 ; 1 Cor. 15 : 19 ; 2
Cor. 4:16-18; 2 Tim. 4:6-8). The attitude of the
apostles was that of humble allegiance to the will of
Christ.
4. Humility must be the fundamental trait in the
character of the Christian (John 3:3). Selfishness is
absolutely foreign to the kingdom of God. The man
who is fundamentally selfish in his actions has not been
"born again, " even if he has been baptized a dozen
times. There is a spiritual side to the new birth, as
well as a formal. Genuine repentance necessitates abso-
lute surrender of the individual will to the will of
Christ.
Saul was a great man when he was little in his own
sight. Then God could use him. But when he set up
his own judgment in preference to the judgment of
God, God could use him no longer; and his career
ended in disaster and suicide.
God justified the publican, but condemned the self-
righteous Pharisee (Luke 18:10-14). A man does not
have to advertise his goodness — all that he needs to do
is to live the life, and the world will soon take notice
(Matt. 7:20). Our eternal state will depend upon our
doing or not doing the will of God in this earthly state
(Matt. 7:21-27; John 5:28, 29; Heb. 5:9; Bev. 22:
14).
The rich young man had a character which the
Master admired. Yet he failed in the crucial test. He
was fundamentally selfish at heart. Because of this
selfishness he failed to inherit eternal life. Although
moral in character, and scrupulously strict in religious
observances, his selfishness deprived him of eternal life
(Mark 10:17-22). Many to-day are unconsciously
proud and selfish at heart, and would fail in the cru-
cial test, as did the young man. Let us all examine
ourselves carefully to see if we have really been "born
again."
The world to-day is looking for the "prints of the
nails" in the life of the individual Christian. Christi-
anity is pre-eminently a religion of sacrifice. Can we,
as professed Christians, live up to the test ? Can we
show, like Paul, that we have been crucified to the
world? (Gal. 6:14). Can we show the world that we
are willing to sacrifice everything for the Master? If
so, the world will be convinced, and will cry out, as
Thomas of old, "My Lord and my God,"