God: "I looked for someone to take a stand for me, and stand in the gap" (Ezekiel 22:30)
It only stands to reason among those who are truly saved that they will spend the duration of their existence with the desire to grow in their knowledge of Jesus Christ. This is a clear indication that we not only love our Savior, but find Him so magnificent that we wish to continually explore new elements of His perfections. Expanding our relationship with Him through biblical awareness and personal experience is at the heart of knowing Christ, is at the heart of a genuine relationship with Him.
(Acts 6:1-7)
IN a similar discourse, relating to the eldership, we
have set down a few facts concerning the two dis-
tinct classes of congregational officers — elders and
deacons. The first four propositions treated in said
sermons — (1) by whom selected, (2) manner of elec-
tion, (3) number elected, and (4) term of office — may
be applied to both elders and deacons. We review
these propositions briefly before proceeding with the
subject in hand.
There are two general rules that apply to the elec-
tion of all church officers: (1) Whatever is done should
be done to the glory of God (1 Cor. 10: 31) ; (2) what-
ever is done must be done decently and in good order
(1 Cor. 14:40).
The apostle commanded the church at Jerusalem
as follows: "Look ye out among you seven men . . .
whom we may appoint over this business" (Acts 6:3).
This teaches that the selection was the work of the
congregation, and that the appointing, or setting aside,
or ordaining to respective offices, was the work of
special representatives of the congregation — in this
particular instance, the apostles. Thus we see at a
glance that ordination is more than mere election.
1. Ordination of officers. Then, what is ordination?
It is the solemn and impressive ceremony by which
those parties duly elected by the votes of the congre-
gation are consecrated to the duties of their offices.
What is the nature of the ceremony? Let us cor-
relate these passages of Scripture : Acts 6:6; 13 : 1-3 ;
14:23; 1 Tim. 4:14. A correlation of Mark 16:16;
Acts 2 : 38 ; Rom. 10 : 10 ; Acts 16 : 31, and Gal. 3 : 27,
gives us faith, repentance, confession and baptism as
the gospel plan of salvation. In the same manner, a
correlation of the above passages gives us the pro-
cedure divinely authorized for the ordination of officers.
That procedure consists of prayer, fasting and the
imposition of hands.
Prayer naturally becomes an essential factor in
every form of worship. It also serves to impress upon
the officers, as well as the congregation, the responsi-
bilities of their relationship to each other and to the
Head of the church.
Fasting is a source of spiritual strength. It is an
open admission that "man doth not live by bread
alone" (Matt. 4:4). Fasting is a means of moral cul-
ture (Acts 13:3; 14:23; 1 Cor. 7:5; 2 Cor. 11:27).
We can see no reason why this element of worship is
omitted from the program of modern churches of
Christ in view of the array of divine authority for it.
We regard the imposition of hands as the form of
ordination. Some will maintain that the laying on
of hands was for the purpose of imparting spiritual
gifts. But such a proposition can not be substantiated,
for several reasons.
a. Old Testament shadows (Eom. 15 : 4) . The first
instance of laying on of hands on divine record (Gen.
48:14). The Hebrew manner of conveying a blessing.
The ordination of Joshua (Num. 27: 18-23) by the lay-
ing on of hands. The consecration of the Levites
(Num. 8: 5-11). The service of the Levites was typical
of the duties of Christian deacons (Num. 1:50-53).
b. In no instances where spiritual gifts were con-
ferred, in the New Testament, were any officers
ordained (Acts 8:15-17; 19:6).
c. In no instance where officers were ordained by
the laying on of hands were any spiritual gifts con-
ferred with the exception of the seven deacons at Jeru-
salem (Acts 6: 16). This was the way in which Philip
became endowed with extraordinary power (Acts 8:
5-9, 13). Paul and Barnabas already possessed the
needed power to perform miracles before they were
set aside for their special evangelistic work (Gal.
2:8, 9; Acts 13: 1-3). There is no allusion to spiritual
gifts in Acts 14:23. From 1 Tim. 4:14 and Acts
16 : 1-3, it is evident that the elders of Lystra laid
their hands on Timothy, not to impart miraculous
gifts, for that could be done only by the apostles (Acts
8:14-20; 19:6; Rom. 1:11), but to make him an
evangelist. The Lord ordains men to office who are
already qualified— and not to qualify them for office.
2. Qualifications of deacons (Acts 6:1-7; 1 Tim. 3:
8-13). There are three general qualifications necessary
to make a man eligible for the deaconship:
a. He must be a man of honest report.
b. He must be full of the Holy Spirit.
c. He must be full of wisdom.
Too frequently churches prematurely insist upon
thrusting new converts into the deaconship. This is
a mistake. These new converts, as well as all others
who might be considered for this office, must first have
been proved and found blameless^ before they are
properly qualified. No man ^an make a good deacon
who is a novice in church activity. Deacons should be
men of experience, just as much as elders.
3. The duties of deacons. Like that of the Levites
(Num. 1:50-53), their duties were those of a secular
nature (Acts 6: 1-7). This includes all benevolent and
charitable activities, the management of finances, the
care of chapels and furnishings, the waiting at the
Lord's table, and so on. There in no intimation that
teaching is a part of the work of the deaconship, be-
yond the extent to which it should be a work of every
Christian.
4. Deaconesses (Eom. 16 : 1, 2 ; Acts 18 : 24-26 ; 1
Tim. 5:9-15). This class of servants, of which Phoebe
is an example, was appointed to look after duties
among the female sex similar to that of the deacons
among those of the other sex.
5. Relationship between the deacons and the congre-
gation. While the deacons, like all other officers, are
servants of God, and hold their office only through the
confidence and esteem of the whole flock, yet their
actions and recommendations should be heartily en-
dorsed and approved by the congregation. And though
the office is somewhat inferior in rank to the eldership
(Phil, 1:1) j yet the work is of such a nature that it
can only be managed by men who are full of the Holy
Spirit and wisdom. By "wisdom" is meant good busi-
ness ability. A combination of spirituality and busi-
ness ability should make a man a splendid deacon in
the church. The language of Paul to the church at
Jerusalem sets such a high spiritual standard for the
deaconship, that those men who are really qualified
and selected for the office are deserving of the respect
and co-operation of the entire flock (1 Tim. 3: 13).
The divine evangelistic policy included teaching,
preaching and nurturing (Matt. 28:18-20). The apos-
tles manifested a constant solicitude for their children
in the faith. "We find them journeying through the
churches time after time; setting them in order,
strengthening them in the service of the Lord.
The divine arrangement for church management
was simple, yet perfect. It made room for four dis-
tinct classes of officers: The apostles, who were super-
naturally qualified, and whose work, once performed,
remains on the divine record as the infallible guide
in all future ages; the evangelists, who labored in word
and doctrine, who established churches, and set them
in order; the elders, who superintended the spiritual
interests of the local congregations; and the deacons,
who superintended the secular interests of the local
congregations. All other titles are included under these
divisions. All improvements upon this plan have
resulted in apostasy, ecclesiasticism and final downfall.
The gospel, being "the perfect law of liberty," does
not make room for any ecclesiastical authority over
any part of the kingdom of God. It demands full
allegiance to the great Head of the church, whose will
is revealed in the New Testament.