Brainwashed by evolution 3
BRAINWASHED #3
. The alleged horse series was created more out of imagination than from fossil evidence. The fossils for this series are not found in the proper time sequence as indicated by the evolutionists, and the major types appear abruptly, without transitions.
. And there is an interesting discrepancy in the skeletal development of this series. . Eohippus had 18 pairs of Ribs. . Orohippus had only 15 pairs. . Then Pliohippus jumped to 19 . Equus Scotti is back to 18. . Darwin cited the giraffe as an outstanding example of natural selection.
Supposedly, as a result of extended droughts, the supply of green leaves could be obtained only at the tops of the trees, and therefore the shorter necked giraffe died off. And the giraffes which grew longer necks survived.
. However, there is no evidence whatever in the fossil record or elsewhere that giraffes with short necks have ever existed. And what would have happened to young giraffes with relatively short necks?
. Darwin failed to realize that body characteristics in offspring are determined and programmed by DNA factors of the Genes or the Genetic material of the parents, and not by the stretching of the neck or any other bodily exercise.
. The cover of the journal, Science, December 9, 1966, shows a photograph of a bat fossil that is alleged to be over 50 million years old. This is said to be the oldest fossil bat, but it is the same as a modern bat! Why isn’t there any evidence of change after 50 million years?
. It might be will now to look at the “evidence” which anthropologists have assembled, in an attempt to reconstruct the evolution of man.
. Some consider Ramapithecus to have been homiid (a man-like ape), and this judgement has been made solely on the basis of a few fragments of the jaw. That’s all the fossil fragments they have.
. Dr. Jolley has recently reported that a species of baboon in Ethiopia has the same dental and jaw characteristics as Ramapithecus. These characteristics are therefore not those of man! Other anthropologists have agreed that Ramapitecus was simply an ape.
. The first find of Australopithecines was by Dart in 1924. He pointed out many ape-like features of the skull, but he believed the teeth to be manlike. Its brain was only about 1/3 as large as that of modern man. It was only about 4 feet tall.
. Recently, Richard Leakey, the son of Dr. Leakey. published evidence that indicated that the Australopithecines were long-armed, short-legged knucklewalkers, similar to living African apes. These creatures were nothing but apes!
. In China, during the 1920’s, fragments of skulls, jaws, and teeth, were found in a limestone cliff near Peking. However, during World War II all the original bones were lost.
. All of these creatures had been killed and eaten, and the skulls preserved as trophies. Some prominent anthropologists believe that hunter was true Man. Peking “man” must then have been simply a giant ape.