Certainly God could with His Spirit instruct and justify those whom He would, but it has pleased His wisdom more to instruct and justify those who believe through the foolishness of preaching. The Word is the channel through which the Holy Spirit is given. [There are biblical passages] against those who hold the spoken word in contempt. The lips are the public reservoirs of the church. In them alone is kept the Word of God... Unless the Word is preached publicly, it slips away. The more it is preached, the more firmly it is retained. Reading it is not as profitable as hearing it, for the live voice teaches, exhorts, defends, and resists the spirit of error. Satan does not care a hoot for the written Word of God, but he flees at the speaking of the Word... This penetrates hearts and leads back those who stray.
Martin Luther

Chance Big Bang Or Creation

Chance Big Bang Or Creation

CHANCE (BIG BANG) OR CREATION?

This theoretical discovery has led some cosmologists to say -> SM>that the universe could have been created by a chance -> SM>fluctuation in space-time. In the words of physicist Frank -> SM>Wilczyk, “The reason there is something instead of nothing -> SM>is that ‘nothing’ is unstable.”

This primeval explosion is supposed to have resulted in a uniform radial expansion of energy and matter. One of the most basic conservation laws of physics is the principle of conservation of angular momentum, which, states, among other things, that uniform radial motion could never give rise to curvilinear motion.

How, then, could the linearly expanding gas soon be converted into orbiting galaxies and panetary systesm??!!!

As I said before the “Big Bang” flatly contradicts the Second Law of Thermodynamics.

Sir Fred Hoyle and many others have rejected the Big Bang theory. As Weisskoph has said:

“No existing view of the development of the cosmos is completely satisfactory, and this includes the standard model, which leads to certain fundamental questions and problems.” -V.P. Weisskoph, “The Origins of the Universe”, American Scientist 1983.

The oscillating-universe idea is also being abandoned.

As what appears to be a desperate attempt to escape the creationist implications of genuine cosmogony, a new wave of cosmo-physicists has offered what you call the “inflationary” Big Bang.

This nonsense suggests that the universe (including all of space and time) began as a infinitesimal particle which inflated to a grapefruit size in its first instand of existence. This initial “cold big swoosh” was then supposedly followed by the standard “hot big bang.

What about the initial particle-sized universe??? Two of the originators of this concept have an answer: “It is then tempting to go one step further and speculate that the entire universe evolved from literally nothing.”

Tryon conjectures: “.. that our universe had its physical origen as a quantum fluctuation fo some pre-existing true vacuum, or state of nothingness.” -Edward Tryon, “What Made the World” New Scientist,84

Therefore ones choice finally boils down to the following: Evolution ex nihilo or Creation ex Deo. The choice used to be: “Eternal Matter” or Eternal God.” Now it has become: Omnipotent Nothingness” or Omnipotent Creator.”

“In the beginning GOD created the heavens and the earth.”