We Love God!

God: "I looked for someone to take a stand for me, and stand in the gap" (Ezekiel 22:30)

Spiritual pride is the illusion that we are competent to run our own lives, achieve our own sense of self-worth and find a purpose big enough to give us meaning in life without God.
Tim Keller

Would you like to be rid of this spiritual depression? The first thing you have to do is to say farewell now once and for ever to your past. Realize that it has been covered and blotted out in Christ. Never look back at your sins again. Say: “It is finished; it is covered by the Blood of Christ.” That is your first step. Take that and finish with yourself and all this talk about goodness, and look to the Lord Jesus Christ. It is only then that true happiness and joy are possible for you. What you need is not to make resolutions to live a better life, to start fasting and sweating and praying. No! You just begin to say: “I rest my faith on Him alone who died for my transgressions to atone.”
Martyn Lloyd-Jones

Apocrypha

Apocrypha

APOCRYPHA

BASIC R.C. BELIEF The books called, by Protestants, the Apocrypha, are called deuterocanonical by the Roman Catholics, and are: Tobit, Judith, Sirach, Wisdom, Baruch, I and II Maccabees. There are also additions to Daniel and Esther.

From ETERNAL LIFE, Catholic Enquiry Centre, Imp. Georgius Craven, page 190. “(II Machabees) is classified in Protestant Bibles as apocryphal, that is, good and useful for instruction but not having the same authority as the other books of the Bible… the Church since the days of the Apostles has always classed it as truly part of the Bible.”

CHRISTIAN COMMENT The definition of “apocryphal” is “of doubtful authorship, false, counterfeit, sham.” There is no documentation of apostolic use of the Apocrypha. St. Jerome included it in his Latin translation, but did not give it the same standing as other scripture. The first conciliar statement of its authenticity was at Trent, hence these writings being called “deutero-canonical”, that is, recognized as canonical at a later date. If it had been recognized as canonical during Apostoloic or even postApostolic times, it would have been recognized as canonical by the Councils of Carthage and Hippo when they defined the canonicity for the New Testament.

While arguing about the canonicity of these books is not primary in Roman Catholic evangelism, we have the following valid reasons for not accepting them:
(1) The Palestinian Jews rejected the Apocrypha (Romans 3:2) (2) The Lord Jesus and the Apostles never quoted from the Apocrypha. (3) The Apocrypha contains some wild stories (see Judith, Tobit) (4) The Apocrypha does not claim inspirtaion (II Macc 15:38) (5) The Apocrypha contains false prophecy (Baruch 6:2) (6) The Apocrypha contains a false salvation message (Tobit 12:8,9).