Principles of Prayer: 1. We must be in fellowship with God: Reconciled to God through faith in our Lord Jesus Christ. 2. We must be obedient to God: By putting away sin, by maintaining right relationships with others, and by striving to abide in Christ. 3. We must depend upon the Lord Jesus Christ and His work on our behalf: We pray in His name. 4. We must exercise faith: Believing prayer has the assurance that we may receive beyond all our asking. 5. We must be ready for action, for faith and works go together: Having prayed, we must be the instruments on occasions by means of which God answers our prayers. 6. We must honestly desire God’s will to be done and His name to be glorified. 7. We must pray with sincerity: God has no time for hypocrites who make a lot of show without reality in their hearts, but He promises to be near those who call upon Him in truth.

Derek Prime

CATEGORY	CUISINE	TAG	YIELD
Grains		Lifetime tv, Life1	1	servings

INGREDIENTS

2		Chayotes; (mirlitons), peeled
		; cut in half, and
		; pits removed
1	lg	Red bell pepper; cored seeded, and
		; cut into julienne
1/2	ts	Olive oil
2		Limes; juice of
		Salt and freshly ground pepper

INSTRUCTIONS

1. Slice the chayotes as thin as possible and cut into julienne.
2. Combine the chayote and bell pepper in a bowl.
3. Add the olive oil and lime juice and season with salt and pepper.
4. Toss well and let sit for 15 to 20 min. before serving.
Copyright credit: 1996 by Larry Forgione
© 1996 Lifetime Entertainment Services. All rights reserved.
Notes: (Makes about 2 cups)
MC formatted using MC Buster by Barb at PK
Converted by MM_Buster v2.0l.

A Message from our Provider:

“Actions DO speak louder than words. Do Jesus’?”

Those who believe that marriage is an evolving concept and that “same-sex marriage” is based on man’s new understanding of the nature of homosexual orientation fundamentally assert that “marriage” itself is a meaningless notion. If the concept of marriage has no fixed reference point beyond the evolving (constantly changing) mind of man, then no idea of marriage can have any permanence or claim to be the right view of marriage since, according to evolutionary dogma, man may yet progress to new understandings of marriage in the future. The logic of evolutionary thought also leads to the possibility that the idea of “same-sex marriage” will be rejected in the future as an ignoble phase of human development for which man should be ashamed. If it might be renounced in the future, on what ethical grounds can it be wrong to oppose it today?

William Einwechter