Evolution Is Satanic AndOr Rel
- Evolution is Satanic (and/or religious) <D.H. “prove it!”
Is it not established that the precepts of the first two laws of thermodynamics promote conservation and decay whereas the evolutionary thesis has growth and developement as it’s standard? This is a fundamental contradiction of supposed absolutes. Granted, temporary negation of entropy can and does exist in an open envinon, as would even be replicated in a testing situation, but such cannot sustain itself for very long because it is not any evolved state of change; it is subject to the influential impact of a `superior’ source of influence.
Man and his knowledges of the sciences and the various forms of cause and effect could alter the existing state of the deteriorating galaxy that our earth is in by tapping the energies, the altering substances, of the universe if man had the capacity to manipulate, or control, these universal elements. Still, this would only be a temporary condition because this galaxy can be construed as an open environ if it’s supposed condition of `evolution’ is supported by another galaxy, or other states of the universe that are not a part of the galaxy.
Speculation of these prospects could go the length of the imaginings based upon the premise that this manipulative power could be harnesssed. Whether it could be attained to or not is not the issue. The issue is that sacrifice would be the ultimate requirement of another valued entity in the universe. The potential life state of another region of the universe would have to be sacrificed for the entropy effect of the one galaxy to be suppressed. Should this occur it would not ultimately eliminate entropy. Decay would begin again at the exhaustion of the energies provide by the sacrifical entity.
This thermodynamic condition is vividly expressed in the Bible as an unalterable condition except for the intervention of a power that can supersceed it. This same Bible that explains the facts of decay gives the explanation for it’s cause. Many would suggest `sin’ as the cause and be misled. Sin is more a condition of cause than it is the cause itself. There was a time when the laws of thermodynamics were not an active influence. Genesis 1:31 “God saw evrything that he had made, and, behold, it was good”. This `good’ is reinterated at Revelation 21:4 for a “new heavens and new earth” which will have absolutely no signs of sorrow, pain, crying, or death. This original earth began “good” without the need to conserve energy; without decay. There was a time when no aging process was in effect. And that same condition is predicted to return again.
It was God who annouced all existance as “good” and who proclaimed that to disobey in the one only command would result is death. God cursed this earth, this universe by the disobediance of the first human beings. Genesis 3:17-19 explains: “Cursed is the ground [or earth] for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life; thorns also and thistles shall it bring forth to thee; and thou shalt eat the herb of the field; in the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken; for dust thou art and unto dust shalt thou return”.
The questions of why and how may come to mind regarding a curse. Of the entire creation only one tree was restricted from the two humans. There was not a thing special about that tree. It didn’t bear any special fruit or have any particularity exclusive to it. The only thing notable was that it didn’t belong to the people. It belonged only to God. This one tree was the only signature of the creatorship authority of God. God warned that to impugn on this authority would result in absolute death. God did not stipulate that a rebellious attitude would result in any disfellowship; only the suffering of death. Death was a condition unheard of before. Even today we’re hard pressed to explain it, much less, suppress it. Howard Curtis has said: “Everyone realizes that he will undergo adverse changes, with the passage of time, which will eventually lead to death in one form or another, and accepts this as inevitable. It is difficult to think of a biological process of more interest to most adults, and yet through the years the explanations for this phenomenon have mostly been couched in vague generalities. Even today gerontologists cannot agree upon a definition of aging.”01
As a matter of record, a totally alien influence came into play to influence the discision. This influence was the epitomy of the mastermind of knowledge, the Arch intelligence of the universe, the master of one third the powers of all existance.
Few self-willed minds of the sciences have accepted life existing without some shape, or substance, or form that isn’t attached materially. They are willing to accept that the substance of what is is the result of the substances that were; and nothing more. To science, it is that `spirit’ is merely conjecture of the mind of man; their own imaginings, the psychic, the psycho-. That, without the body and a brain, without a mind and a soul, there is no spirit. The same application is applied to `spirit’ as is to the cause of all forms of life; that substance subjected to action has caused its’ own existance.
Under these basic concepts the prospect of living spirit without form or material substance is handily rejected. Even the superstitious concept about ghosts is based upon spirit left over after the death of a material body. So, science has spirit like Santa Clause as only in the minds of the believers; remove the belief and it’s existance is no more.
The creationist’s view comes from an entirely different perception. Their pretence has that spirit is the most real method of existance. That God is spirit and is life without end and has caused the existance of all things. God is the author of all spirit beings. He created each and every angel. He created all matter and life indwelt (constrained) in the material. Here are the two kinds of life: first life of spirit that is called angels and second life of material substance that depends upon the well-being of the material to sustain its’ existance.
The support for these beliefs are the entirety of the Bible writings which supports the claims and gives proofs to the authority and power of the God of creation. This God is claimed to be the only true God. He is claimed to have no one or nothing else to be compared with. He is claimed to be of three major characteristics: He is Omnipotent (not limited in authority or power), He is Omniscient (knowing all things), He is Omnipresence (quality of being everywhere present at the same time). He is characterized as absolute righteousness.
This knowledge about God is, necessarily, a matter of faith to all who are not God. Because there is no other entity having all these attributes there can be no method to be fully aware of these claims as true or false. Only in the deepest analysis of these claims can anyone come to a basis of opinions. Because God claims these characteristics to be his, both, exclusively and infinitely, we {who are not capable of these characteristics} must accept everything on faith and through the experience of validating this testimony come to an individual realization about its’ acceptance.
The premise of fundamental christianity, Judaism, and the creationist principle is that only one God exists, is active deity, and is the creative force of all other existances. The second perception has the most intelligent forms of life being that of created angels; who are spirit and observing of God’s judgements and actions. Of the angels one stands out as opposing to those precepts attributed to God’s creativity. It is told of this angel that he was amoungst the most dynamic, becoming an Archangel in all capacities; in beauty, wisdom, and powers. He is said to have desired to become equal to or greater than the creator God. The Christian claim has him as the deceiver of truth.
To speculate about this Archangel there are two prospects of views to entertain. To prepare ourselves to an understanding we must accept, by faith, the consensus that God has the greatest knowledge and understanding of this Archangel and the angel has the greatest wealth of experiences in the awareness of God. We, as limited in knowledge and wisdom, can only formulate ideas based on an analysis of the perspectives. We can only weigh in the balances our inclination to accept the testimony of one more than the other.
The first indication of this conflict is expressed in Genesis 3:4 where the Archangel pronounces in response to the testimony “Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die” that “Ye shall not surely die: For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good from evil”. This is the most explicite statement of contradiction against God’s supposed, all-knowing, all-honest, testimony. It renders the view that God is not to be trusted in the words he says or the truths he expounds.
If this Archangel declares God to be a deceiver of truth, two possibilities are evident: either the angel truly believes God is capable of deception and willing to use deceptive practices or he knows God’s attributes place His character beyound reproach so that any action of deception must be the angel’s exclusive weapon of combat. If it is accepted that God has deceived truth to the created man and woman, it must be accepted that God has also been capable of the same deception to created angels. Now that the prospect of God telling lies has been considered it can, further, be accepted as possible that God is not even the creator he claims to be; that God might only be God because of the condition of circumstances that allowed him to enter into that position. Once this speculation is entertained the credibility of the attributes claimed to God, exclusively, becomes questionable.
The Archangel has himself in a dilemma of belief in God. Even though he has the greatest amount of experience about God he doesn’t have full knowledge and awareness. The angel doesn’t know, except by faith, that God never came into existance, or had a beginning. He only knows what God has told him: that God is everything he claims, that God created everything else that is [whether living or not], that there is only the one God and there can never be another God.
Disbelief causes many possibilities of speculation inwhich Evolution is the foremost. Evolution states that matter has always been; that motion of matter has caused the generation of the life entity; that all things living have the inclination towards improving it’s own existance.
Even though the angel has had every opportunity to witness the creative capability of God he has not the realization, without faith, that he, himself, was created by God. This strikes against the very doctines of creationism, supported by Scripture. It expostulates that God has a hidden motive for concealing from the Archangel the true source of his existance. Quite possibly, accepting the furtherance of this train of thought, both God and the angel came out of the same source; God evolved as did the angel; But, only God knows the truth. If it is possible that God evolved into the greatest power, it becomes possible that the angel could evolve greater than God by abdicating the characteristics that are Gods.
The two basic possibilities are expressed. The Archangel, Lucifer, confronted the issue: God had said he is the only non-created entity and has created all life. To accept this in faith would be pleasing to God (Ezekeil 28:13,15). But there must have come a time when wonder questions if this is really so. The only evidence remains God’s word. If this were not true, Lucifer could accept being locked into a secondary role of government. If true, he is the most magnificient of creatures; second only to God. Lucifer chose the path of rejection, of rebellion, contrary to the words of God.
In such, rational must promote the notion that both he and God and all other beings had come into existance in similar fasion; of essentially the same order. God was not really God. His order only preceeded the others and power of control was claimed. There is no creator at all. Everything must have come about by a process of natural growth, of developement, of evolution.
Evolution has become the rational of Lucifer. He will stand by it’s precepts to the end. He has taken this philosophy to all the angels and won over one third (Psalms 14:1; 53:1). When God created Adam and Eve, all the host of angels saw. For Lucifer and his followers it was not understood as a creative act. It was the taking of elements already in existance and formulating them into the life substance; an example of evolution being manipulated. If God has the knowledge to generate life from substances then others can gain this skill and replicate new life. Lucifer, the second intellect, could learn these skills and do as well or better than God (Isaiah 14:13-14).
Adam and Eve, the only parents of all of humanity [no other humans were created], bought into the philosophy of evolution. They believed the serpent’s suggestion that God’s Word was not to be trusted. That God was deceiving them just as He had deceived all intelligent life. Lucifer, the rejector of God, becoming Satan, has offered the desire for knowledge [science] as the reward for rejecting God’s Word. “Ye shall not surely die: For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good from evil”.
“This must be the original source of the theory of evolution. This is the only possible explanation of origins apart from God. Some kind of process of evolution will, therefore, be found at the core of every religion or philosophy of man, apart from the Word of God, as revealed in the Holy Scriptures and in the Living Word, Jesus Christ.”02
01″Biological Mechanisms Underlying the Aging Process,” Science, V. 141, 02″The Twilight of Evolution,” Henry M. Morris, June 1986, p.81