You need to log in to create posts and topics.
Re: FOR loops
77,940 Posts
#1 · December 2, 1997, 1:59 pm
Quote from Forum Archives on December 2, 1997, 1:59 pmPosted by: Greg_Neagle <Greg_Neagle@...>
In message ID <Pine.GSO.3.96.971201235303.19463C-100000@interport.net> on
12/2/97, futurebasic@welovegod.org wrote::here's a dumb question: why did the original FOR loop use the word FOR?
:It doesn't fit any use of the word FOR that I know.For "x", use the values 1 to 10...
- via BulkRate 2.6.x
Posted by: Greg_Neagle <Greg_Neagle@...>
In message ID <Pine.GSO.3.96.971201235303.19463C-100000@interport.net> on
12/2/97, futurebasic@welovegod.org wrote:
12/2/97, futurebasic@welovegod.org wrote:
:here's a dumb question: why did the original FOR loop use the word FOR?
:It doesn't fit any use of the word FOR that I know.
For "x", use the values 1 to 10...
- via BulkRate 2.6.x
Click for thumbs down.0Click for thumbs up.0