Green Lentils With Garlic And Ginger

The law of God had a definite function in the history of redemption. It still has a function, but it is not the same function as it had in Israel’s experience. The law that worked wrath in Israel’s conscience has been fully silenced and does not work, in any sense, either wrath or blessing in the Christian. The law of God can neither curse nor bless a Christian. It cannot curse a Christian because Christ has endured every curse the law threatened, and it cannot bless a Christian because even with a new heart, the child of God cannot earn the blessing that is the reward for perfect obedience. However, just as Christ endured every curse the law threatened, he also earned every blessing the law promised. If you read the law and feel guilt and despair, you do not understand justification, and if you read the law and feel good about your progress in sanctification, you are a deceived, self-righteous hypocrite.

John Reisinger

CATEGORY	CUISINE	TAG	YIELD
Grains			1	Servings

INGREDIENTS

8	oz	Uncooked green lentils
2		Green onions
2		Cloves of garlic crushed
1		1-inch cube of ginger grated
1	t	Cumin seeds
1/2	t	Ground cumin
1/2	t	Ground corriander
		Salt to taste.

INSTRUCTIONS

A book , I highly recommend on the subject, is Jay Solomon's "Lean
Bean Cuisine" covering everything you want to know regarding bean
cookery. This will get you started. I did not like lentils that much
until I found this recipe.  Cook lentils until all water absorbed, set
aside. In a pan saute green  onions, garlic, ginger and cumin seeds in
a vegetable broth. Once  sauted, add lentils and rest of spices. Posted
to fatfree digest V96  #247  From: Monique Garus <mgarus@direct.ca>
Date:   Fri, 6 Sep 1996 09:07:34 -0700

A Message from our Provider:

“Love is the doorway through which the human soul passes from selfishness to service. #Jack Hyles”

On March 6, 1857, the Supreme Court, in Dred Scott vs. Stanford, ruled that no act of Congress or territorial legislature could make laws banning slavery. The fundamental argument was that slaves are not free and equal persons but the property of their masters. The ruling is analogous to Roe vs. Wade because today no state may make a law banning abortion to protect the unborn. The argument is similar: basically because the unborn are at the sovereign disposal of their mothers and do not have personal standing in their own right. There was no consensus in this country on the personhood and rights of salves. We were split down the middle. But the issue was so fundamental that the states went to war, and in the end the Lincoln administration overturned the Dred Scott decision. And today, 130 years later, we look back with amazing consensus and marvel at the blindness of our forefathers.

John Piper