Name: Pork Tenderloin with Poached Apples
Ingredients: 2 Whole pork tenderloins; about 1 1/2 lbs.; Salt and pepper; to taste; 3 Bacon strips; 1/2 c Apple cider vinegar; 1/2 c Water; 1/4 c Sugar; 1 md Jonathan apples; cored and sliced into wedges, (up to 2)

A Christian is not one who simply buys “fire insurance,” who signs up just to avoid an unpleasant after life. A Christian…repeatedly, is one whose faith expresses itself in submission and obedience. A Christian is one who follows Christ, one who is committed unquestionably to Christ as Lord and Savior, one who desires to please God. His basic aim is to be in every way a disciple of Jesus Christ. When he fails, he seeks forgiveness and wants to move forward. This is his spirit and his direction.

John MacArthur

CATEGORY	CUISINE	TAG	YIELD
Meats			6	Servings

INGREDIENTS

2		Whole pork tenderloins; about 1 1/2 lbs.
		Salt and pepper; to taste
3		Bacon strips
1/2	c	Apple cider vinegar
1/2	c	Water
1/4	c	Sugar
1	md	Jonathan apples; cored and sliced into wedges, (up to 2)

INSTRUCTIONS

Don't know if anybody else caught the All In Good Taste Show on HGTV today,
but, Carolyn Wells was on there preparing and sharing a couple of BBQ
recipes, one of which, was the Apple City Sauce. Here's the recipe, and a
couple of others that she did, along with some other recipes that looked
pretty good from the show. Granted, they're not all BBQ, but, let's face
it... The time will come when you'll have to break down and use that stove
of yours again sometime! <G><
Trim the pork tenderloins of excess fat. Salt and pepper to taste. Set
aside. In a large frying pan over medium heat, fry the bacon until it is
brown and crispy. Remove the bacon from the pan and drain it on paper
towels. Crumble and reserve.
Reduce the heat to medium-low and add the pork tenderloins to the bacon
drippings. Cook the tenderloins for about 20 to 30 minutes, turning often,
until they are tender and dark golden-brown on all sides. Remove the
tenderloins from the pan and place them on a platter.
Combine the vinegar, water, and sugar in a small bowl. Pour the mixture
into the drippings and add the apple wedges. Bring to a boil over high
heat. Boil rapidly, stirring occasionally, until the apples are tender and
the mixture reduces and becomes syrupy, about five to seven minutes.
Return the tenderloins to the pan and add the crumbled bacon. Cook for one
minute, turning the tenderloins once to coat with the apple syrup. Place
the pork on a serving platter with apples and syrup over the pork.
Posted to bbq-digest by PhantomBBQ@aol.com on Sep 9, 1999, converted by
MM_Buster v2.0l.

A Message from our Provider:

“The best mathematical equation I have ever seen: 1 cross + 3 nails = 4 given.”

Ten Arguments against the use of birth control and a response to each: 1. Genesis 1:28; 9:1. But: a. If this were a specific command to every individual, every man and woman would be required to marry. But clearly marriage is not a universal obligation (Jesus, Paul, 1 Cor. 7). b. This text does address the responsibility to bear children but says nothing about how many or for how long. Nothing in the text explicitly requires us to have as many children as is biologically possible. c. Gen. 1:28 must be read in the light of 1:26. 2. Deut. 23:1 – The argument is that this prohibition reflects God’s displeasure with any means of birth control. But: a. There is nothing to indicate that these men were castrated as a means of birth control. b. In all likelihood, this refers “not to states of infertility produced by illness or accident, but to deliberate acts of castration at times associated with pagan worship in the ancient Near East” (Davis, p. 37). 3. Genesis 38:6-10 (Deut. 25:5-10). But: a. Onan’s sin was not that he violated the general command to have children, but that he violated the specific obligation in the law of levirate marriage. His action was sinful not because he used a form of birth control, but because he disobeyed a legal responsibility to raise up seed in his deceased brother’s name (probably because he didn’t want to assume the personal and financial obligation of raising them). b. Lev. 20:10-21 lists specific sexual crimes punishable by death under the Mosaic Code. If coitus interruptus, such as that committed by Onan, were regarded as an abuse or sin, one would expect to see it in this list. 4. Psalms 127:3-5; 128:1-6 – No one would dare disagree that children are a wonderful blessing from the Lord. But: a. Why should we conclude from these texts that we are morally obligated to have as many children as is biologically possible? b. As with all God's blessings, we must be wise and prudent stewards in the enjoyment of them. 5. The purpose of sex in marriage is procreational, not recreational. But: a. The Bible reveals at least [four other] purposes for sex in marriage. b. “If sex were intended only for procreation, then it would be strange that nature has it that women can procreate less than half of their married life…and then only at a very limited time each month” (Geisler, p. 215-16). c. If this argument were valid, it would be sinful for a married couple to have sexual relations subsequent to female menopause or a hysterectomy or in cases where either husband or wife is sterile. 6. Birth control is unnatural and artificial. Common sense suggests that the purpose for human sexual organs is reproduction. Anything that prohibits or interrupts the sex organs from performing their appointed role is thus sinful. But: a. “If the sole purpose of sexual intercourse is procreation, then why did God give women the desire for sexual intercourse at times when they cannot become pregnant? Does not the natural order of things, then, demonstrate that procreation is not the only purpose of sex?” (Feinbergs, p. 175-176). b. We do many so-called unnatural things that run counter to and hinder so-called nature, none of which any of us would regard as immoral or unbiblical: shaving, air-travel, mowing the lawn, etc. c. If we consistently applied this principle we would be forced never to employ medical assistance, medication, or surgery. d. Those who employ this argument concede the use of the rhythm method and abstinence during times of ovulation, none of which is itself natural (charting or scheduling intercourse based on body temperature, etc., is hardly natural; and abstinence runs counter to the natural sex drive). 7. Birth control betrays a lack of trust or faith in the sovereignty of God. He is Lord over the womb. If God wants us to have children, He should be free to bestow them. If He doesn’t want to, He (and He alone) should have the power and prerogative to prevent conception. But: a. We must be careful that our trust in God is not simply irresponsible behavior. b. If this argument were consistently applied, we should never work, use locks or alarms on our homes, save money for emergencies, purchase life or health insurance, wear safety goggles when using a weed-eater, use sun-screen when outside, or support the police or national defense. 8. Birth control has the potential to alter in a destructive way our concepts and experience of love and commitment. But: a. The fact that birth control may yield negative consequences does not itself make birth control wrong. The absence of intimacy, promiscuity, etc., are wrong, not because one may have employed a contraceptive device, but because such things are declared to be wrong in the Bible. 9. Birth control encourages promiscuity among both married and unmarried people. But: a. We must distinguish between an object and the purpose or use to which an object is put. Cars are not sinful simply because people can use them to escape the scene of a crime they’ve just committed. The fact that an object can be used for immoral purposes does not necessarily prove the object is in and of itself immoral. 10. Birth control devices have negative side-effects and are detrimental to one’s health. Since our bodies are the temple of the Holy Spirit, we should not employ those things that do damage to our physical constitution. But: a. If a birth control device is found conclusively to have physical destructive side-effects, it should not be used. But such scientific evidence does not exist for all methods of contraception.

Sam Storms