Venison Steaks With Compound Cranberry Butter

To gain entire likeness to Christ, I ought to get a high esteem of the happiness of it. I am persuaded that God’s happiness is inseparably linked in with His holiness. Holiness and happiness are like light and heat. God never tasted one of the pleasures of sin. Christ has a body such as I have, yet He never tasted one of the pleasures of sin. The redeemed, through all eternity, will never taste one of the pleasures of sin; yet their happiness is complete... Every sin is something away from my greatest enjoyment... The devil strives night and day to make me forget this or disbelieve it. He says, Why should you not enjoy this pleasure as much as Solomon or David? You may go to heaven also. I am persuaded this is a lie — that my true happiness is to go and sin no more.

Robert Murray McCheyne

CATEGORY	CUISINE	TAG	YIELD
		Sainsbury13	2	Servings

INGREDIENTS

50	g	Unsalted butter, softened
		2oz
20	g	Dried cranberries, soaked in
		tablespoons apple
		juice 3/4oz
1		Packet, 250g/350g venison
		steaks

INSTRUCTIONS

2
Mix together the butter and cranberries. Place on a sheet of cling
film and roll into a 'sausage' shape. Chill until firm.  Brush the
venison steaks with olive oil and grill following pack  instructions.
Serve immediately topped with slices of the cranberry butter.
Converted by MC_Buster.  NOTES : A light main meal ideally served with
new potatoes and fine  green beans.  Converted by MM_Buster v2.0l.

A Message from our Provider:

“Misunderstood? No one understands like Jesus”

Nutrition (calculated from recipe ingredients) ---------------------------------------------- Calories: 1204 Calories From Fat: 690 Total Fat: 76.9g Cholesterol: 336.5mg Sodium: 284mg Potassium: 1832.4mg Carbohydrates: 46.6g Fiber: 2.4g Sugar: 41.7g Protein: 80.9g

Those who believe that marriage is an evolving concept and that “same-sex marriage” is based on man’s new understanding of the nature of homosexual orientation fundamentally assert that “marriage” itself is a meaningless notion. If the concept of marriage has no fixed reference point beyond the evolving (constantly changing) mind of man, then no idea of marriage can have any permanence or claim to be the right view of marriage since, according to evolutionary dogma, man may yet progress to new understandings of marriage in the future. The logic of evolutionary thought also leads to the possibility that the idea of “same-sex marriage” will be rejected in the future as an ignoble phase of human development for which man should be ashamed. If it might be renounced in the future, on what ethical grounds can it be wrong to oppose it today?

William Einwechter