AntiHate Laws

ANTI HATE LAWS

From the Detroit News, Monday, December 4, 1989 we read that it’s “an unholy alliance united in the defense of free speech.” This has to do with things going on in Ottawa, Canada, where a former Elberta High School teacher taught his students that the holocaust was a hoax, a neo-Nazi ran a dial-a-racist telephone service, and leaders of the white supremacy National Party took their case for freedom of expression to the Supreme Court of Canada.

“In a major test of the charter of rights and freedom, Canada’s highest court will be asked to draw the line between legitimate constitutionally protected free speech, and illegal hate mongering.”

See how it is worded? Anybody’s speech you don’t like, you call “illegal.” That is if anybody’s speech offends you, you call it “hate mongering,” and therefore it is “unconstitutional.” See how it’s done? “The Supreme Court will try to decide between two opposite appeal court rulings on the constitutionality of Canada’s controversial yet seldom used hate propaganda laws.” What is that? That is stuff set up by the Roman Catholic church to keep you from attacking their practices, their beliefs, their doctrines, or their perversions of the scripture. This thing was brought about by the sentencing of a man named Donald Clark Andrews to twelve months in jail, and another man named Robert Wayne Smith, who was sentenced to a seven month term in jail. They were sentenced for claiming that non-white groups were inferior, unclean, responsible for violent crimes, and an economic threat to whites.