Magnetic field shows earths you

The Magnetic Field Shows Earth’s Young Age

Sorry, read “Origin and Destiny of the Earth’s Magnetic Field. Barne’s theory for a young magnetic age for earth is the only theory of the source of the earth’s dipole magnet that is supported by the following important FACTS:

1. A rigorous mathematical physics solution
2. A history of real-time evaluations of the state of the magnet (its magnetic moment). Gives evolutionists a “Maloox Moment.” :_))
3. A clearly identified source of energy (its won magnetic field energy).
4. A definitive predictive value.
5. A means of computing its source energy and subjecting that value to an an independent check that would have falsified the the theory had there not been a check.

On the other hand, the presumed dynamo theory has no substantive theoretical basis and no definitive predictive value. Its presumed reversal mechanism has admittedly remained inscrutable. The presumed supporting paleomagnetic data contributes to the NOISE, not the signal.

This coupled with the many other evidences of a “young” earth leaves the evolutionary hypothesis back in the dinasaur era of science.

Interesting how the latest scientific findings on origins are, that everything came from nothing, supports the Creation Model. They just can’t bring themselves to accept that a Creator God did this.

Unfortunately for evolutionary scientists, the reversal _hypothesis_ has absolutely no valid scientific theoretical basis. Furthermore, rock magenetization cannot be used to support these so-called reversals becasue there is a self-reversal process known to exist in rocks, completely indedendent of the earth’s magnetic field (Thomas G. BArnes, “Depletion of the Earth’s Magnetic Field”).

Do you see what’s happening? They have a “factual” uniformatarian hypothsis for an “old earth” and when they discover this doesn’t add up due to lack of any empirical evidence they decide that “punctuated equilibriam” is what must have happened. Then they have a problem with the earth’s magnetic field and must, based on their evolutionary belief system attempt to explain it away with another VERY weak hypothesis of the dynamo hypothesis.

The data used by Barnes and others were truly for the earth’s dipole magnet. to get them, world wide measurements had to be made and integrated over a considerable period of time and over the entire globe. NO LOCAL or REGIONAL measurement of magnetic moment could ever be used to do this alone since there are innumerable local magnetic fields which can strongly influence and affect, or mask the field in any given region. Thus, to think that the remanent magnetism in a suite of rocks or an archeological site could be used to determine the earth’s overall dipole magnetic strength or direction accurately at that time in history is naive extrapolation carried to extremes, particularly if such a determination is in conflict with that measured on a worldwide basis.

In addition, it’s just another weak hypothesis to overcome the previous weak hypothesis. DO you see what the belief system (if you will) of evolutionary thought does? First they state categorically a uniformatarian geology. Then when no fossil evidence supports transitional forms they jump to the “punctuated equilibrium” hypothesis along with catastrophism.

The analysis developed by Dr. Barnes is based on sound physics, careful calculations, and solid data. The dynamo hypothesis, and the fluctuating and reversing magnetic field concept (except on a localized basis), are little more than the ad hoc notions, with no sound basis in either theory or measurement.

The only real reason for rejecting the first and promoting the second is that the first supports recent special Creation; the second tries to salvage a bankrupt evolutionary uniformatarianism.

When you take all the evidence for a young earth, the evidence of paleontology, biochemistry (remember Denton’s proteins), the laws of science (yes, the Law Giver), DNA, the incredible complexty of timing, space, and life, etc., etc., it boils down to, not the facts as to believing in A Creator God, but the will.

You see, evolutionists cannot
let this hypothesis be untrue as it sticks another pin in their fragile baloon of evolution. The “air” has already gone out of it, and they are running out of “patches.” :-)))

Ah, the faith of “hopeful monster” mentality. And they say Christians refuse to see the facts. :)) That’s just it. We do! And, it confirms to us everyday, that “In the beginning God CREATED the Heavens and the earth…”

Just take a look at empirical science through the Creation Model? I’ll say it again. How can anyone make an intelligent decision on partial information? We are living in exciting days for the Christian. “Our redemption draweth nigh.”

Look around you. Look at the prophetic happenings in the world (don’t give me that nonsense about self-fulfilling prophecy, ad pukem :)).

When you put the prophecies of the Bible together with what’s happening in empirical science, and the world, one is left without excuse. But, as I said He’s “pro-choice.” He won’t force anyone to to “Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and thou shal be saved.”

“As in the days of Noah shall it be.” And, it is.