Second Law Entropy

Second Law (entropy)

I’ll stand by what men of science have to say about it. Entropy does not increase in an open or closed system.

The Second Law opens another huge
gap along with the transitional forms in the evolutionary hypothesis. The imaginary age-long evolution of the biosphere must, of course, be discussed in terms of open-system thermodynamics, but this fact in no way helps the case for evolution..

The influx of heat energy into any open system (as, say, from the sun onto the earth) will NOT naturally improve the organization of that system, as evolution would require, but will increase the entropy (that is disorganization) of the system more rapidly than if the system remained closed. to verify this, one need only examine the simple thermodynamic equation for heat flow into an open system.

Where do evolutionists get the
quaint and quite unscientific notion that solar energy is a sufficient explanation to account for evolution? Solar energy has not generated life or evolution on Mars or Venus, so how can it so so on earth? The fact is that any system that does experience an increase in its organized complexity must be much more than merely an open system with external energy available to it.

These are necessary, but not sufficient, conditions. in addition, the system’s growth in complexity must be directed by a previously created program and then energized through a previously designed energy storage and-conversion mechanism. E.g Seed into a plant is directed by its genetic code and implmented by the echanism of photosysnthesis. Similarly the “evolution” of a building fromna pile of bricks, etc. is dircted by a bluprint implemented by the construction machinert and the muscular skills of the builders.

The evolution of the earth’s biosphere in the spacetime continiim, from primeval checmicals to a complex array of plants, animals and human beings represents a far greater increase in organized complexity that a plant or a building, yet it apparently had no directing program (chance?) and no solar energy conversion mechanism (mutations?). Thus, the entropy principle does indeed define any significant amount of upward naturalistic evolution as completely unsecientific. Evolution would require an unending string of miracles to make it work!